Be careful who you tax
Earlier this week, a 108 year-old tax was scrapped.
What I find most instructive about the tax is two-fold: 1) almost no tax is ever a 'temporary' tax--usually the name changes but the taxing remains the same, and 2) taxes that target the wealthy usually impact many more people eventually, in one form or another.
Bowing to changes in technology and pressure from taxpayers and phone companies, the Treasury Department said yesterday that it would scrap the 108-year-old federal excise tax on long-distance phone calls. The move will bring consumers and businesses about $15 billion in refunds on next year's tax returns.
The decision, which applies to cellphones and Internet phone services and some landlines, follows a series of court reversals for the government. ...
That is a far cry from 1898, when the tax was first levied and there were 681,000 phone subscribers in the United States, according to James Katz, a telecommunications historian at Rutgers University. Though relatively small in numbers, those subscribers paid a considerable amount in taxes to help finance the government's battle against Spain.
The annual basic charge for a home phone in the 1890's was about $100, or more than $2,200 in today's dollars. A three-minute call from New York to Chicago in 1902 cost $5.45 — about $120 today.
What I find most instructive about the tax is two-fold: 1) almost no tax is ever a 'temporary' tax--usually the name changes but the taxing remains the same, and 2) taxes that target the wealthy usually impact many more people eventually, in one form or another.

0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home